Friday, December 5, 2025
This Big Influence
  • Home
  • World
  • Podcast
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Awards
  • Shop
No Result
View All Result
This Big Influence
No Result
View All Result
Home Health

Extreme longevity and health optimization: What it really takes

ohog5 by ohog5
June 6, 2025
in Health
0
Extreme longevity and health optimization: What it really takes
74
SHARES
1.2k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


You might also like

AI Now Decodes Your Sweat to Spot Early Signs of Disease

Scientists Close In on a Universal Cancer Vaccine

Everyday Plastics Could Be Fueling Obesity, Infertility, and Asthma

“I need to know I’m doing completely every little thing I can to protect my well being for so long as doable.”

We hear this sort of factor so much.

Folks inform us they not solely need to keep in fine condition as they age, in addition they need to outlive their friends and age expectations.

Think about you would maximize your healthspan and lifespan, fend off illness, and usually stay match, lean, and youthful into your 90’s, 100’s, after which some.

Sounds fairly compelling, doesn’t it?

There’s only one downside: Frequent longevity recommendation appears to contain a unprecedented quantity of effort. And time. And cash. And complexity.

Is all the trouble mandatory? Is it price it?

And, will it even work?

On this article, we’ll discover:

And, we’ll assist you to weigh the professionals and cons so you can also make knowledgeable choices about your well being, your physique, and your life.

The myths—and realities—of “optimizing” your well being

Well being and longevity recommendation is in every single place nowadays: podcasts, books, social media, that man on the fitness center…

Plus, influential “figureheads” have given the motion outsized consideration. Suppose: in style podcasters and well being consultants Dr. Peter Attia, Dr. Andrew Huberman, and Dr. Rhonda Patrick, and biohacker Bryan Johnson.

We perceive the attraction of this sort of content material. Who doesn’t desire a longer, more healthy life? (To not point out the comforting sense of management that may come from designing and executing a “excellent” well being plan.)

However for us at PN, the place we’ve collectively coached a whole lot of 1000’s of individuals with actual human lives, we all know that “optimum” is never life like.

Not solely that, optimum isn’t mandatory.

Making modest, comparatively constant efforts in direction of well being and well-being will possible provide you with higher outcomes than following an intense, extremely “optimized” protocol.

If that sounds exhausting to consider, we get it. So let’s discover that daring assertion, beginning with the most important myths surrounding longevity and well being optimization.

Delusion: The “fundamentals” aren’t sufficient.

There’s an concept that getting and staying wholesome should require a set of advanced, “innovative” methods—particularly in case your aim is to survive the common American.

In actuality, the “fundamentals” work actually, actually properly. (These are issues like exercising repeatedly; consuming a nutrient-rich food plan; getting sufficient sleep; managing stress; and staying socially linked. We’ll talk about these extra later.)

Solely, only a few folks do the fundamentals persistently.

The true cause extra folks aren’t dwelling as lengthy, or as properly, as they may very well be isn’t as a result of they’re not taking ice baths or getting vitamin C infusions…

It’s as a result of they’re not doing the (comparatively) easy stuff, persistently.

For those who’re actually, actually doing a well-rounded set of health-promoting behaviors with 80-90 % consistency, you’re in all probability already near peak optimization.

Delusion: Extra is best

If a handful of primary behaviors get outcomes, then doing them completely and as a lot as doable will assist you to get, and keep, even more healthy—proper?

Not so quick. There’s a regulation of diminishing returns in terms of well being and health efforts.

Graph shows that with small amounts of health effort, longevity can improve a lot, but as those efforts increase, longevity benefits plateau

Plus, in our expertise, doing too many issues or including in an excessive amount of complexity to your well being and health regime can:

  • Add threat components that might truly make your well being and health worse (equivalent to persistent accidents or burnout resulting from overtraining, and/or nutrient deficiencies or disordered consuming resulting from an over-preoccupation with “clear” or restrictive consuming).
  • Make it tougher so that you can maintain good habits. Individuals who tackle an excessive amount of usually tend to burn out. Analysis reveals individuals who attempt to accomplish a number of targets are much less dedicated and much less prone to succeed than these centered on a single aim.1
  • Make your life much less pleasurable, which in flip compromises well being. Striving to maximise bodily well being can intervene with psychological, emotional, and social well-being, which performs a vital position in healthspan and lifespan. (One research confirmed folks with excessive ranges of happiness and life satisfaction lived as much as 10 years longer than folks with low ranges.2)

And what’s the purpose of dwelling longer in the event you’re not dwelling a full, well-rounded, pleasurable life? Whereas some effort is unquestionably necessary, previous a sure level, extra isn’t essentially higher.

Delusion: Reducing-edge methods provide important advantages.

Let’s say you might put all these superior, advanced methods into motion with out sacrificing consistency or life enjoyment, or compromising your total well-being.

They’d should repay, wouldn’t they?

Not essentially.

A lot of the analysis on longevity optimization (up to now) is both in mice, is observational, is theoretical, or has been examined on very small numbers of individuals for very quick intervals of time.

In actual fact, lots of the fringe strategies and dietary supplements touted by influencers or biohackers aren’t solely unproven however even probably unsafe.3 4 5 6

Level being: Put your efforts in direction of foundational well being behaviors with confirmed monitor information (the sort we’ll cowl on this article) earlier than you put money into fringe efforts.

Delusion: It’s all or nothing.

You would possibly suppose, “Effectively, I’m not getting off the bed at 5 a.m. 5 occasions per week to go operating for 60 to 90 minutes to optimize my VO₂ max, so I could as properly simply settle for I’m not going to be a wholesome individual.”

Some people really feel overwhelmed by the concept of optimizing their well being, so that they determine they may as properly do nothing.

Nevertheless, our inner information reveals which you could be removed from “excellent” to get outcomes.

In our 12 months lengthy PN Teaching program, even shoppers who practiced their (primary) habits lower than half of the time bought measurable outcomes.

10-49% consistency gets results; ALT TEXT: Graph shows men and women with 10 to 49 percent consistency still lost 11 pounds, 8 to 11 inches in girths, and 2 to 3 inches from waist

(Learn extra: Nearly 1 million data points show what it REALLY takes to lose fat, get healthy, and change your body)

Don’t let optimization tradition persuade you nice well being is past your capabilities.

As an alternative, we encourage you to…

  • Think about your choices. Overview the details, and get a transparent understanding of which behaviors are almost certainly to provide the greatest bang on your buck.
  • Get clear on the tradeoffs. Resolve which issues you’re, and aren’t keen to decide to.
  • Make choices that align along with your targets. Together with what sort of way of life you need, and the way you need to spend your time and {dollars}.

Hold studying and we’ll information you thru it.

The advantages—and tradeoffs—of a wholesome way of life

Placing effort in direction of your well being is nice. However efforts include tradeoffs.

Right here’s a have a look at each the efforts, and the tradeoffs, to realize the well being you need for your self.

Large image shows six categories of health levels: coasting, light effort, medium, high, very high, and extreme. The medium and high categories offer the best “return on investment” in terms of effort and sacrifice versus overall health benefits.

A deeper look: The simplest well being behaviors (and their optimum dose)

If you wish to scale back your threat of persistent illness, and usually keep more healthy for longer, what must you do?

As we stated earlier, the problem isn’t that we want some extremely detailed, cutting-edge protocol. The fundamentals work. The problem is that most individuals don’t do them.

For instance, as proven within the picture under, most individuals don’t get sufficient fruits and veggies, sleep, or train. And the quantity of people that do all this stuff frequently (whereas additionally avoiding tobacco and minimizing alcohol) is extraordinarily low: possible a fraction of a %.

Graph shows only 10 percent of people eat 5 servings of fruits and veggies daily; 15 percent sleep 7 to 9 hours a night’ 24 percent get recommended weekly aerobic and resistance exercise; 71 percent drink moderately or less; and 89 percent don’t smoke

Lastly, let’s take a better have a look at what these fundamentals are, and the “candy spot” of effort versus reward.

Foundational Well being Habits #1: Train repeatedly

All well being consultants agree: Transferring your physique is necessary.

Sure, train will assist you to keep lean, and enhance temper, power, and performance, however it’ll additionally assist you to keep alive (and more healthy) for longer.

In actual fact, a research of Harvard alumni discovered that any quantity of bodily exercise reduces the danger of dying from any trigger. Train prolonged lifespan no matter physique weight, blood stress, smoking habits, or genetic predisposition.7

One other research of 272,550 older adults discovered participating in even low quantities of bodily exercise considerably decreased threat of dying from most cancers, heart problems, and all causes.8

Particularly, steep threat declines occurred when accumulating at the very least 7.5 MET-hours* of exercise per week. The best improve in advantages got here from attaining 7.5 to fifteen MET hours. Rising exercise past that additional decreases threat, however at a regularly decrease fee, because the graph under reveals.

Graph show that cancer mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality all decrease as exercise increases, with the greatest increase in benefits from achieving 7.5 to 15 MET hours of exercise per week

*MET-hours (Metabolic Equal Hours) measures the power value of exercise, primarily based on period and depth. Some examples: 2 hours of resting = ~2 MET-hours; 2 hours of moderate-intensity cardio exercise = ~8 MET-hours; 2 hours of average resistance coaching = ~7 MET-hours.

Rising the depth of train is an environment friendly strategy to rack up MET-hours, however plain previous strolling counts too: In a research of 28,000 adults, each 1,000 each day step improve was related to a 12 % decrease threat of dying. (This affiliation started at 2,500 steps and continued as much as 17,000 steps.)9

(Cool factoid: For folk involved with dementia specifically, one research confirmed that getting simply 3,826 steps per day was related to a 25 % lowered threat of dementia—and getting 9,826 steps per day was related to a 50 % decrease threat!10)

Ideally, cardiovascular exercise is paired with resistance or weight-bearing train.

Resistance coaching helps well being and longevity in varied methods: it will probably assist protect helpful muscle mass, preserve psychological sharpness, enhance odds of surviving most cancers, help metabolic well being, and usually assist you to keep alive.11

Amongst older adults particularly, falls are a number one reason behind dying.12 Resistance coaching can each forestall the danger of falls–due to improved steadiness and muscle stability13—in addition to scale back the danger of great harm–due to higher bone density.14Image shows how resistance training and aerobic training benefit numerous areas of health, such as cognitive function, blood sugar regulation, mobility, and more.

A sedentary way of life does the alternative, growing threat of heart problems, diabetes, hypertension, most cancers (breast, colon, colorectal, endometrial, and epithelial ovarian most cancers), and all-cause mortality.15

In actual fact, 20 years of sedentary way of life is related to twice the danger of untimely dying in comparison with being bodily energetic.16

▶ How a lot train must you do?

Customary train suggestions recommend:17

  • 150 minutes per week of moderate-intensity cardio exercise, or 75 minutes per week of vigorous cardio exercise (or some mixture of each), plus
  • 2 periods per week of resistance coaching, focusing on most main muscle teams

Getting as much as 300 minutes per week of moderate-intensity or 150 minutes of vigorous-intensity cardio exercise (or some mixture of each) in addition to three resistance coaching periods per week supplies additional advantages.

▶ Are folks getting sufficient train?

Most individuals aren’t.

Solely 24 % meet the suggestions for each cardio and resistance train. And fewer than 47 % of American adults meet suggestions for cardio bodily exercise.17

▶ Is getting greater than the beneficial quantity higher?

For essentially the most half sure, however previous a sure level, extra effort delivers much less profit—and probably extra threat.

Overtraining (and/or under-recovering) can disrupt hormone ranges, mess with sleep and temper, trigger extra fatigue, chronically elevate your coronary heart fee, trigger accidents, and extra.18 19 Excessive volumes of endurance train coaching could also be detrimental for the guts, and improve threat of myocardial fibrosis, coronary artery calcification, and atrial fibrillation.20 21 22 23

So, the advantages of train exist on a U-shaped curve. (This is called the “Excessive Train Speculation,”24 as seen within the picture under.)

Graph shows a u-shaped curve where health risks are highest when exercise is either very low or extremely high, with the least risks at moderate or high exercise.

A “excessive” quantity of train is nice for you, however the “highest” quantity doable in all probability isn’t. (Well being advantages possible max out round 7-10 hours of cardio, and 3-4 resistance coaching periods per week.)

We like what one research concluded: “If the mantra ‘train is medication’ is embraced, underdosing and overdosing are doable.”25

Foundational Well being Habits #2: Eat a nourishing, nutrient-rich food plan

Consuming properly doesn’t should be sophisticated. There are a couple of key parts to nail down, and the remaining is as much as your individual private preferences and wishes.

We recommend specializing in three diet fundamentals.

Dietary key #1: Eat extra complete and minimally-processed meals

Entire and minimally-processed meals are naturally nutrient wealthy—full with fiber, wholesome fat, nutritional vitamins, minerals, and phytochemicals—and much much less calorie-dense than highly- or ultra-processed meals (UPFs). In addition they have much less sugar, sodium, and trans fat—the latter which is straight linked to an elevated threat of heart problems, breast most cancers, issues throughout being pregnant, colon most cancers, diabetes, weight problems, and allergy.26 27 28

These qualities contribute to their many well being advantages; Diets wealthy in complete or minimally-processed meals are related to decrease charges of despair,29 30 31 coronary heart illness,32 sort 2 diabetes,33 most cancers,34 and improved longevity.35

The biggest research on processed meals—which included virtually 10 million members—discovered UPFs are linked to 32 dangerous results, together with sort 2 diabetes, psychological well being issues, weight problems, heart problems, and all-cause mortality.36

One other research discovered {that a} larger consumption of ultra-processed meals (4 or extra servings each day) was related to a 62 % elevated threat of all-cause mortality. (For every further serving of ultra-processed meals, all-cause mortality elevated by 18 %.)37

Not that it’s good to be plucking tomatoes straight off the vine.

Consuming a minimally processed meals food plan is extra about total dietary patterns—and shifting alongside the continuum of enchancment—quite than rigidly avoiding all types of processing.

Illustrated table shows various foods types and their whole, minimally processed, or ultra-processed options. All foods exist on this continuum between whole and ultra-processed.

▶ What number of minimally-processed meals must you eat?

There presently aren’t any formal pointers for the quantity of minimally-processed meals to eat. In our expertise teaching over 100,000 shoppers, we discover individuals are most happy, and get important well being enhancements, when 70 to 80 % of their food plan comes from complete or minimally-processed meals.

Any enchancment counts although. For those who’re presently consuming only a few complete and minimally processed meals, getting at the very least 50 % of your food plan from these meals would make a giant distinction to your well being, power, and longevity.

▶ Are folks consuming sufficient minimally-processed meals?

No.

Latest US information reveals that People get about 28.5 % of their energy from complete or minimally-processed meals, and 56 % of their energy from highly- or ultra-processed meals.38

▶ Is getting greater than the beneficial quantity higher?

Not past a sure level.

For those who need to, consuming as much as 90 % of energy from minimally-processed meals will actually maximize your advantages, however past that there are possible no additional advantages.

Apart from, some processed meals improve well being quite than detract from it. Take into consideration the protein powder that helps you meet your protein necessities, the industrial salad dressing that helps you eat your greens, or the weekly brownie à la mode you share along with your grandkid that brings pleasure to each of your lives.

(Learn extra: What you should know about minimally-processed foods vs. highly-processed foods)

Dietary key #2: Eat 5 vegatables and fruits

You’ve heard it 1,000,000 occasions. We’ll be the nag and say it once more: Eat your fruits and veggies.

A large research involving over 1.8 million folks confirmed that consuming extra vegatables and fruits was considerably related to a decreased threat of dying—with the advantages plateauing at 5 servings a day. Individuals who ate 5 servings a day had a 13 % decrease threat of dying from any trigger in comparison with individuals who ate two servings per day.39

Moreover, the consumption of vegatables and fruits very possible reduces the danger of hypertension, coronary coronary heart illness, and stroke; in all probability reduces the danger of most cancers; and probably prevents weight achieve.40

▶ What number of vegatables and fruits must you eat?

A wholesome goal is 5 fist-sized servings of vegatables and fruits each day. (Usually, we suggest dividing that into three servings of veggies and two servings of fruit.)

For bonus factors, attempt to eat a wide range of colours.

The pigments in fruits and veggies come from varied healthful vitamins (referred to as phytochemicals or phytonutrients). Totally different colours imply totally different phytochemicals, supplying you with a various array of those useful compounds, that are possible answerable for a majority of the well being advantages of vegatables and fruits.

(Learn extra: What the colors of fruits and vegetables mean)

▶ Are folks consuming sufficient vegatables and fruits?

No.

People solely eat a median of two.5 servings of produce (fruit and greens mixed) per day.41

Solely 12.2 % of individuals meet fruit consumption suggestions, and fewer—9.3 %—meet vegetable consumption suggestions.

A mere ten % of People get a full 5 servings of vegatables and fruits mixed per day.42

▶ Is getting greater than the beneficial quantity higher?

There are possible diminishing returns to consuming greater than the above ideas.

In that huge research talked about earlier that noticed 1.8 million folks, the life-extending advantages of fruits and veggies plateaued at 5 servings per day.39

In different phrases, larger consumption (past two servings of fruit and three servings of greens) was not related to further illness threat discount.

That stated, there could also be different advantages to consuming extra vegatables and fruits. For instance, resulting from their fiber and water content material, vegatables and fruits are filling but low in energy, to allow them to help weight administration—they usually actually aren’t going to hurt your well being.

Dietary key #3: Eat sufficient protein

Protein is an important macronutrient to get proper, particularly as we age.

Plant protein specifically is linked to a lowered threat of heart problems and dying from all causes.43 44 45

When it comes to animal proteins, the outcomes are extra combined. (That stated, analysis on protein consumption and mortality is mostly primarily based on observational research that don’t give us clear concepts about trigger and impact.) Usually, minimally processed types of fish, poultry, and low-fat dairy are one of the best animal protein sources.

To reduce well being dangers equivalent to diabetes, heart problems, and most cancers, restrict processed types of pink meat (like bacon, sizzling canine, deli slices, and pepperoni sticks). Even unprocessed types of pink meat ought to possible be restricted to about 18 oz (~4 to five palm-sized parts) or much less per week.46 47 48

Nonetheless, whatever the supply, getting ample protein—at the very least 1.2 g of protein per kg of physique weight—considerably reduces the danger for sarcopenia (muscle loss), frailty, and neuromuscular decline.49 50

Protein can also be important for sustaining and constructing muscle, retaining bones and delicate tissues wholesome, supporting immunity, and extra. It’s additionally essentially the most satiating macronutrient, and thus useful for fats loss and/or physique recompositioning.

▶ How a lot protein must you eat?

The present USDA suggestion for protein consumption is at the very least 0.8 grams of protein per kg of physique weight (0.35 g/lb). Nevertheless, newer analysis suggests that is possible the absolute minimal quantity, and just for comparatively younger sedentary people.

A greater minimal consumption for many is probably going 1.2 g/kg (0.55 g/lb, or about 3 to five palm-sized parts of protein-rich meals), particularly for older adults, as they’re at better threat of muscle loss.

Protein consumption for muscle progress and retention, and/or if performing resistance coaching or different vigorous train can be 1.6 to 2.2 g/kg (0.75-1 g/lb), or about 4 to eight palm-sized parts of protein-rich meals.

▶ Are folks consuming sufficient protein?

That is dependent upon how “sufficient” is outlined.

Most adults eat at the very least 0.8 g/kg. Nevertheless, as much as 10 % of younger ladies and as much as 46 % of older adults don’t hit this mark.51 And, as famous, that suggestion might be conservative in comparison with the perfect consumption.

Protein can also be particularly vital for these on GLP-1 drugs (Ozempic, Wegovy, Zepbound) to assist forestall the muscle loss they’ll result in. Aiming for at the very least 1.2 g/kg is important for this inhabitants, particularly if they’re additionally older. (Getting nearer to 1.6 g/kg is even higher, if doable.)

▶ Is getting greater than the beneficial quantity higher?

When you stand up to 1.2 g/kg, not essentially. That quantity is probably going sufficient for many, particularly sedentary people.

For those who’re making an attempt to construct muscle and power or get better from vigorous train, or are taking GLP-1 treatment for fats loss, striving in direction of 1.6 g/kg would assist you to obtain that aim extra simply.

For those who’re making an attempt to maximise power and muscle positive factors, and/or are doing numerous strenuous train, consuming 1.6-2.2 g/kg is perfect (with the best finish of that vary maxing out all advantages).

What about dietary supplements?

Dietary supplements make up a big a part of the dialogue round getting older, however in actuality solely play a small position in terms of growing well being and longevity.

Utilizing dietary supplements (like a multivitamin, or physician beneficial vitamin D or iron) to stop or right deficiencies may be useful for total well being well-being.

Then, there are different dietary supplements which have moderately robust monitor information and might help us meet dietary wants (protein powder), enhance efficiency (creatine), or probably even gradual getting older (fish oil would possibly gradual organic getting older by a small quantity).52

Nevertheless, the buzziest, trendiest dietary supplements are sometimes much less confirmed.

For instance, curcumin, spirulina, and ginger are sometimes listed as dietary supplements that may assist with irritation, an indicator of getting older. Nevertheless, the analysis right here remains to be early, and much from definitive.

There are additionally even much less substantiated dietary supplements that may modify different features of getting older (resveratrol, NAD+, NAC), however the proof is both very minimal or solely in animal fashions.

Some dietary supplements (particularly natural dietary supplements) may even trigger hurt, like liver harm.53

If you wish to give dietary supplements a attempt, examine for high-quality third-party seals of approval from organizations equivalent to NSF.

Examine.com—a web-based database that gives impartial analysis summaries and analyses on hottest dietary supplements—can also be a superb useful resource that will help you decide which dietary supplements would possibly truly be efficient.

Regardless, speak to your healthcare supplier earlier than taking dietary supplements, notably in the event you take different treatment.

Foundational Well being Habits #3: Get sufficient sleep

Analysis reveals that males who get sufficient high quality sleep dwell virtually 5 years longer than males who don’t, and ladies who get sufficient dwell two and a half years longer.54

Research additionally present sleep is simply as necessary on your coronary heart well being as train, complete meals, weight administration, ldl cholesterol, blood stress, and blood sugar management.55

In comparison with 7 hours of sleep per day, a 1 hour lower in sleep period has been related to an 11 % elevated threat of heart problems and a 9 % elevated threat of sort 2 diabetes.56

Older adults who sleep lower than 6 hours per night time are at larger threat for dementia and cognitive decline than those that sleep 7 to eight hours.57 (Deep sleep helps clear beta-amyloid plaques and wash out toxins from our mind, considered partially answerable for dementia.)

▶ How a lot sleep must you get?

Sleep consultants agree that 7 to 9 hours an evening on common—with at the very least 7 hours of sleep most nights of the week—is good for many.

Nevertheless, the precise ultimate hours could range individual to individual.

Usually, the correct amount of sleep for you is the quantity that lets you really feel comparatively refreshed shortly after waking up, and lets you go to sleep comparatively simply at bedtime, with comparatively sustained power all through the day.

▶ Are folks getting sufficient sleep?

A couple of third of US adults don’t meet the beneficial quantity of seven to 9 hours of sleep per night time.58

▶ Is getting greater than the beneficial quantity higher?

Not essentially.

Plainly 7 to 9 hours of sleep an evening is good when it comes to well being outcomes.56

Curiously, longer sleep period (over 9 hours per night time on common) is related to an elevated threat of heart problems, sort 2 diabetes, and total mortality.59 60 61

Nevertheless, it’s not clear that these dangers are prompted by sleeping extra. Simply as possible, it could be different well being issues (equivalent to despair, sleep apnea, or heavy alcohol consumption) that result in each longer sleep occasions and larger well being dangers.

(Learn extra: Transform your sleep—The scientific way to energize your body, sharpen your mind, and stop hitting snooze)

Foundational Well being Habits #4: Handle stress

When left unchecked for lengthy intervals of time (say, months or years with out intervals of restoration), stress can have unfavourable results on practically each side of our well being, because the under picture reveals.

Image shows the variety of effects chronic, unmanaged stress can have on the body, from brain fog, frequent infection, poor recovery, weight gain, and more.

Persistent stress—which tends to extend coronary heart fee, blood stress, and irritation—will increase the danger of heart problems.62 63 64 Moreover, long-term stress tends to worsen psychological and emotional well being, growing the danger of tension and despair.65 It might probably additionally make folks extra prone to flip to substances like alcohol as an try to cope.66

That stated… Not all stress is dangerous.

In actual fact, stress is a traditional, pure, and even useful a part of life; the correct amount helps us really feel motivated, purposeful, and engaged with life.

So, quite than avoiding or demonizing stress, it’s useful to work with it, utilizing it as a possibility to develop wholesome coping mechanisms, acceptable restoration methods, and total resilience.

And this doesn’t essentially imply sitting on a cushion and meditating.

Stress administration can embody easy mindset shifts: Working towards self-compassion,67 having a progress mindset,68 and framing stress as a traditional and even useful a part of life69 have all been related to higher coping beneath stress.

Primary self-regulation abilities additionally assist. This includes noticing and naming what you’re feeling, having good management over your actions, and utilizing a broad vary of coping abilities to assist your self course of feelings and get better from stress. With these abilities, you construct self-awareness and the flexibility to deal with challenges higher, as a result of you understand how to calm your self down after an activating occasion—no matter the way it went.

The under picture affords a spectrum of extra—small and large—methods to manage stress.

Image shows a continuum of options for stress management, ranging from 1 to 10 on an effort scale.

▶ How a lot stress administration must you have interaction in?

Consider stress administration and restoration as a factor you do in proportion to the stress and calls for of your life.

We regularly use the analogy of a jug: When stress drains your tank, stress administration and restoration practices assist fill it again up once more.

Image shows a faucet pouring water into a jug next to a list of recovery practices. These are things that fill your recovery jug. There is also a faucet draining water out of the jug next to a list of stressors. These are things that drain your jug. The goal is to fill your jug as much as you are draining it.
And, as with all the foundational well being habits we’ve mentioned, each little bit counts.

Whether or not you’re experiencing a bit or plenty of stress in your life, even three to 5 minutes of purposeful restoration—doing deep respiratory workout routines, some journaling or mild stretching, or simply stepping exterior to get some recent air and take heed to the birds—might help fill your tank.

▶ Are folks doing sufficient to handle stress?

In all probability not.

Within the US, over 1 / 4 of individuals report that almost all days, they’re so burdened they’ll’t perform.70 In Canada, it’s comparable: Slightly below 1 / 4 of individuals say that almost all days of their life are both “fairly a bit” or “extraordinarily” hectic.71

Moreover, over a 3rd of individuals say they don’t know the place to begin in terms of managing their stress.72

▶ Is getting greater than the beneficial quantity higher?

Not essentially.

The aim is to seek out your stress “candy spot.” As a result of all of us take pleasure in and tolerate differing types and quantities of stress, how you’re feeling is definitely a reasonably good indicator of whether or not stress is just too low, too excessive, or “excellent.”

Because the picture under reveals, in the event you typically really feel bored and purposeless, stress is probably going too low; in the event you really feel energized and engaged, stress might be near your “candy spot”; and in the event you really feel panicky or so overwhelmed you’ve began to really feel hopeless, stress is probably going too excessive.

Image shows a continuum of stress. When stress is too low, we feel bored or purposeless. When stress is just right, we feel energized and engaged. When stress is too high, we feel anxious or numb.

Whereas having a routine for stress administration is a great concept, there’s possible a degree of diminishing returns right here too. For those who’re in that stress “candy spot” (energized/engaged, not bored and never overwhelmed), then including extra stress discount methods won’t assist additional—and may very well add stress by supplying you with one more activity to do.

Foundational Well being Habits #5: Keep socially linked

You won’t consider social connection as a well being crucial, however it’s.

Not solely is the social and emotional help related to improved well-being, it’s additionally related to lowered threat of untimely dying.73 74 When relationships are robust, folks have a 50 % elevated chance of survival throughout any given time.75

In actual fact, one of many longest operating research—the Research of Grownup Improvement out of Harvard Medical College, which has been monitoring members for over 87 years (and counting)—discovered that robust relationships have been the most important predictor of not solely life satisfaction however longevity. (Relationships have been extra predictive of those outcomes than social class, wealth, IQ, or genetics.)76

No shock, not having a social circle comes with its personal distinct dangers.

Social isolation and loneliness can improve an individual’s threat for coronary heart illness and stroke, sort 2 diabetes, despair and nervousness, suicidality and self-harm, dementia, and earlier dying.77 78

A incessantly cited statistic highlights its profound impression:

The impact of social isolation on mortality is corresponding to smoking as much as 15 cigarettes per day79—surpassing even the dangers related to weight problems and bodily inactivity.80

▶ Are folks getting sufficient social connection?

It appears many people might use extra pals.

About 1 in 3 adults report feeling lonely, and 1 in 4 report not having social and emotional help.77

Eight % of adults say they haven’t any shut pals, 53 % say they’ve between one and 4 shut pals, and 38 % report having 5 or extra pals.81

▶ How a lot social connection must you purpose for?

Usually talking, analysis finds that individuals who have three to 5 shut pals they repeatedly work together with (one to 3 occasions per week, in-person or by way of telephone name) get essentially the most social profit.82 83 84 85

On common, interplay with a smaller group of individuals tends to supply extra profit than a big community of acquaintances.86

That stated, particular person wants range. For those who really feel authentically linked to others, have a robust sense of belonging, and usually really feel socially fulfilled, that’s what issues most.

▶ Is getting greater than the beneficial quantity higher?

Doubtless not. Some proof means that extreme social engagement (each day or a number of occasions each day) truly would possibly improve mortality threat.87 That’s in all probability as a result of over-socializing can improve psychological, emotional, and bodily fatigue,88 and infrequently this degree of socialization contains alcohol or different probably dangerous behaviors.

Moreover, it will probably take away time and power that may very well be put in direction of different life-building and health-promoting behaviors (like work, train, or sleep).

The takeaway? Attempt for socializing that brings worth to your life. No want so as to add a lot that you simply wind up exhausted, or unable to maintain up with different priorities.

Foundational Well being Habits #6: Reduce recognized harms

Minimizing actions we all know to be dangerous is a key a part of taking care of your long-term well being, but it may be simple to miss this stuff. (Possibly as a result of we’d quite hold doing them.)

Two of the most important culprits are smoking and ingesting alcohol.

Hurt Avoidance Key #1: Don’t Smoke

Everyone knows smoking is dangerous for us. However smoking remains to be comparatively frequent:

  • Within the US, 10.9 % of adults smoke cigarettes, and 6.6 % smoke e-cigarettes.89
  • Globally, the development is even larger: 22.3 % of the world’s inhabitants use tobacco (36.7 % of males and seven.8 % of girls).90

The WHO estimates greater than 8 million folks die prematurely yearly from tobacco use (with a further 56,000 folks dying yearly from chewing tobacco).91 This makes tobacco a number one (i.e. prime 3) threat issue for untimely dying and all-cause mortality.92

Smoking can also be a threat issue for a number of persistent situations, together with coronary coronary heart illness, stroke, emphysema, and most cancers.93 (Globally, a couple of quarter of most cancers deaths are attributed to smoking.90)

Hurt avoidance key #2: Restrict alcohol

At this level, the analysis is fairly clear: Alcohol has unfavourable implications on your well being, particularly previous a sure level of normal use.

Two graphs show that risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer increase a lot with heavy drinking, and a little with moderate drinking

Alcohol performs a causal position in 200+ ailments, notably liver ailments, coronary heart ailments, at the very least seven forms of cancers, despair, nervousness, alcohol use issues, and dementia.94 95

In 2019, 2.6 million deaths worldwide have been attributable to alcohol consumption.96 For folks within the 15-49 age vary, alcohol is the main threat issue for dying, with 3.8 % of feminine deaths and 12.2 % of male deaths attributable to alcohol use.97

▶ How a lot alcohol is “secure” to drink?

US steering on alcohol suggests retaining consumption at average ranges, or much less.98

A average consumption means:

  • Two drinks or much less per day for males (14 or much less per week), with not more than 4 at a single sitting
  • One drink or much less per day for girls (7 or much less per week), with not more than 3 at a single sitting

Importantly, a drink is outlined as containing 14 grams (about 0.6 fluid ounces) of pure ethanol, which equates to:

  • 12 ounces of normal beer (5% alcohol by quantity)
  • 5 ounces of desk wine (12% alcohol by quantity)
  • 1.5 ounces of 80-proof distilled spirits (40% alcohol by quantity)

▶ Are folks limiting their alcohol sufficient?

Within the US, folks are likely to drink greater than the beneficial pointers.

In 2021, the Nationwide Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism reported that the common American aged 21 or older consumed 2.51 gallons of pure alcohol over the course of a 12 months—equal to about 10 normal drinks/week.99 Nevertheless, analysis suggests surveys sometimes underestimate consumption by 40 to 50 %.100 Additional, different analysis reveals that the heavier an individual drinks, the extra considerably they’re prone to underestimate and/or underreport their ingesting.101

All that to say, the common American is probably going having extra (and even way more) than 10 drinks per week.

Add to that:

  • In 2016, 36.4 % of People (age 15+) stated that they had at the very least one episode of binge ingesting (6+ drinks in a single session) within the final month102
  • About 7 % of the world’s inhabitants aged 15+ years have an alcohol use dysfunction96
  • Alcohol-related deaths have been rising: within the final 5 years, alcohol-induced deaths have elevated by 26 %103

▶ Is extra abstinence from alcohol higher?

In 2023, the WHO launched a press release saying no quantity of alcohol is “secure.”104 This interpretation remains to be debated, and information continues to emerge.

Right here’s our take: An abstinence-only coverage is probably going a failed coverage for a lot of. Relatively, we wish folks to learn to allow them to make intentional choices.

To be clear, alcohol is just not useful for bodily well being; it’s a recognized human carcinogen. Nevertheless, whereas alcohol does improve well being dangers, threat doesn’t rise in a linear vogue with consumption. That means, small doses are unlikely to have a major impression in your well being. However if you drink extra closely, the dangers rise exponentially.105

Consuming closely can imply both:

  • Having greater than 7 drinks in per week for a girl, or greater than 14 drinks in per week for a person, or
  • Having 4 or extra drinks in a single sitting for a girl, or 5 or extra drinks in a single sitting for a person (binge ingesting).

(Reminder: A single drink refers to these definitions talked about beforehand. Pints of beer, and closely poured wine glasses and cocktails are greater than single servings… Simply because it matches in a single glass doesn’t imply it counts as “one” drink.)

In the end, it’s about discovering the extent of threat you’re keen to tolerate relative to no matter advantages you’re feeling alcohol supplies you.

Our basic suggestions:

  • For those who’re in any other case wholesome and haven’t any different alcohol-related threat components, restrict ingesting to average ranges or much less
  • For those who’re in any other case wholesome however have one or two alcohol-related threat components (equivalent to breast most cancers historical past), restrict ingesting to mild ranges (1 to three or 4 drinks per week) with occasional average intakes on particular events, or much less
  • When you have a number of alcohol-related threat components (equivalent to breast most cancers historical past, household historical past of alcoholism, or contraindicated drugs) abstain from alcohol solely

Foundational Well being Habits #7: Do Primary Preventive Well being Measures

In all of the chatter about longevity optimization, it may be simple to neglect about all of the boring—however no much less necessary—issues that assist you to keep secure and wholesome all through your life.

These embody issues like:

  • Getting common check-ups, or seeing your physician or healthcare supplier if questions or issues come up
  • Getting beneficial bloodwork, screenings, and vaccines
  • Getting and retaining blood ldl cholesterol, sugar, and stress in beneficial ranges as early as doable
  • Frequently seeing your dentist, and repeatedly brushing and flossing
  • Working towards safer intercourse
  • Seeing medical specialists as beneficial or acceptable (OBGYN, optometrist, ENT, dermatologist, and so forth.)
  • Carrying seatbelts (Buckling up within the entrance seat reduces threat of deadly harm by 45 %!106)
  • Carrying a helmet when biking, skateboarding, or motorbiking
  • Frequently carrying sunscreen (Used appropriately, sunscreen decreases threat of pores and skin cancers by 40 to 50 %107 108)
  • Defending your listening to (Untreated listening to loss will increase dangers for despair, social isolation,109 110 cognitive decline,111 dementia,112 113 and falls114 115)

… And usually utilizing frequent sense. (As in, keep away from the “maintain my beer” sort stuff.)

Primary well being upkeep and threat avoidance practices matter—so much.

Notably, we are able to’t management each component of the environment. Some components influencing our well being are extra structural and systemic, woven into the material of our societies.

These are referred to as social determinants of well being, and embody poverty, racism, homophobia, lack of lodging for disabilities, and displacement (as within the case of refugees). For some people, doing the above protecting behaviors—like visiting the household physician, getting glasses, going to the dentist, and even strolling safely down the road—shall be tougher, generally close to inconceivable.

This isn’t meant to be a throwaway line that diminishes the troublesome actuality for thus many individuals, however quite a gritty, life like mantra: Do one of the best you’ll be able to with what you’ve bought.

▶ How a lot preventative well being care do it’s good to do?

Usually talking, purpose to be in keeping with the habits you understand you “ought to” do.

You understand the drill: Brush and floss each day; put on your helmet each time you journey a motorbike; put on your seatbelt each time you drive; placed on sunscreen if you exit into the noon solar; don’t repeatedly blast your music at full quantity; and so forth.

And in case you have lingering issues in your “I ought to actually do this” checklist (like getting that bizarre mole checked out, or that bloodwork executed), go do it.

▶ Are folks practising sufficient primary preventative well being measures?

We’ve provided a long-ish checklist of primary well being practices that may defend well being, so we received’t go into every in-depth.

That stated, when wanting on the above checklist, it’s in all probability honest to say most individuals will discover a couple of behaviors they may apply extra persistently.

For instance, whereas most of us are actually in keeping with our seat belts (utilization is near 92 %!116), many people might get away the floss extra typically (solely 32 % of People floss each day117).

And, analysis reveals that solely about half of cyclists and motorcyclists put on helmets when using118 119 120 (and use is even decrease amongst skate boarders and rollerbladers121).

Listening to loss is the primary modifiable threat issue for dementia,122 so ensure you additionally observe the “60/60 rule” in the event you wish to pump up the tunes in your headphones: Hear at 60 % of your system’s most quantity for 60 minutes, then take a break. (And put on earplugs if you mow the garden!)

▶ Are extra preventative measures higher?

As soon as once more, there’s possible a regulation of diminishing returns in terms of preventative well being measures, identical to every little thing else.

The purpose isn’t to turn out to be obsessive about eliminating all doable dangers at each flip.

Relatively, it’s that affordable efforts in direction of defending your well being do depend, they usually‘re immeasurably extra necessary for total well being than the most recent optimization fads.

Bonus Foundational Well being Habits: Foster a way of objective and that means

Analysis persistently reveals that having a robust sense of objective and that means for our life improves our well being, total well-being, and longevity too.123

A way of objective appears to assist folks dwell longer, even when controlling for different markers of psychological well-being.

There’s one thing uniquely useful about having a robust objective that’s totally different from, say, being pleased.

Having a robust sense of objective can imply many issues, nevertheless it typically signifies that you’ve got targets, and an purpose in life.

This objective may be many issues:

  • Serving to others
  • Being linked to household and/or shut pals
  • Being a key a part of a neighborhood
  • Having fun with a passion
  • Studying new abilities

Having objective could assist with longevity for a couple of causes:

It makes you extra prone to have interaction in health-promoting behaviors, equivalent to getting sufficient sleep and consuming extra vegatables and fruits.123

It additionally tends to enhance psychological well being. For instance, one research confirmed that individuals with the strongest sense of objective had a 43 % lowered threat of despair.123

Lastly, it could merely assist folks dwell longer as a result of it makes you need to dwell longer. When folks have a way of objective, they typically need to dwell longer, more healthy lives, to allow them to fulfill that objective to its fullest. And whereas eager to dwell received’t make it so, it actually doesn’t damage.

Nonetheless fascinated with optimizing? Think about these further tradeoffs

We hope it’s clear by now: You’ll be able to take your self actually far with some strong fundamentals (that may themselves take some respectable effort and time!).

However, if you wish to go even additional, your effort may need to extend exponentially, simply as these positive factors turn out to be much less sure, and extra marginal.

Right here’s what to bear in mind.

First, it takes plenty of time (and cash) to optimize.

Let’s evaluate the time and monetary funding of two imaginary folks.

The primary individual is what you would possibly name a “wholesome” or “medium effort” individual. They’re somebody who’s fairly persistently assembly all the above suggestions.

The second individual is what you would possibly name an “optimizer.” They do all of the above suggestions, however to the max, and lots of the fringe suggestions typically mentioned on health-related podcasts and books.

How a lot money and time would possibly every of those folks put money into their well being efforts on a weekly foundation? Right here’s what that may seem like.

Table compares various activities and costs of a regular healthy person and an “optimizer”. Generally, it takes 3 to 4 times the time and cost to “optimize” exercise, nutrition, and self-care activities.

On prime of that, there are “optimizing” behaviors and assessments that is likely to be carried out much less typically—say, month-to-month, seasonally, yearly, and even each few years. In fact, these practices will nonetheless require money and time, so although they’re much less frequent, they nonetheless should be accounted for.

Listed here are some examples of these sorts of merchandise, therapies, and checks:

  • Dietary dietary supplements (vitamin, mineral, and/or natural dietary supplements; “superfoods”; fish oil; probiotics, resveratrol, NAD+, NAC, curcumin, & extra)
  • Bloodwork testing (for superior lipid testing, inflammatory markers, hormone ranges, and nutrient standing)
  • IV remedy (for hydration, nutritional vitamins, glutathione, or NAD+)
  • Infrared sauna periods
  • Plasma transfusions
  • Gene remedy
  • Stem cell remedy
  • Medical tourism and therapeutics retreats
  • Full-body MRIs
  • Genetic testing
  • Concierge medical providers
  • And extra…

Although it’s exhausting to estimate the price of this stuff, opting to do only a handful might simply value an additional $10,000+ per 12 months.

Total, we’d estimate it takes at the very least three to 4 occasions the time, effort, and cash to observe an “optimizer” sort way of life, in comparison with a plain previous “wholesome” way of life.

As we’ve seen above, this 3-4x effort will possible translate to some further advantages, however the medium-effort “wholesome” way of life will possible get most individuals at the very least 80 % of the outcomes they’re after (equivalent to improved lifespan, healthspan, and high quality of life).

Apart from, optimizing too a lot can negatively impression your well-being and high quality of life.

The tougher and extra excessive somebody’s health or well being regime, the tougher they sometimes fall off the wagon. So, taking over an excessive amount of can truly put you extra prone to quitting the foundational well being behaviors we talked about earlier.

Even in the event you keep it up, over-focusing on well being and longevity will virtually actually intervene along with your means to take pleasure in a full, well-rounded, significant life.

For instance, in the event you get too centered on bodily well being, you could discover different features of your deep health and total wellbeing endure, equivalent to your relational, existential, psychological, and emotional well being.

Image shows that there are six domains of deep health: social, physical, existential, emotional, mental, and environmental.

Take this a step additional, and “optimizing” can tip over into obsession. Typically, beneath the floor of “I simply actually care about my well being” is disordered consuming, orthorexia, or one other psychological well being situation.

Graph shows that with small amounts of health effort, life satisfaction and overall well-being can improve a lot, but as those efforts increase, well-being benefits plateau

This, to us, is the guts of issues: It’s necessary to not solely keep comparatively wholesome, but in addition to take pleasure in your life when you’re dwelling it.

In actual fact, having fun with your life isn’t separate from good well being. It’s a part of it.

What to do subsequent

1. Make clear your targets.

Take a step again and think about what you really need most for your self.

What sort of life do you need to have?

How necessary is it to maximise your healthspan and lifespan, and the way does that line up along with your different priorities?

2. Think about the tradeoffs.

Given what you need most for your self, and the sources you’ve got accessible, what’s life like for you?

How a lot time, cash, and energy are you keen to place in to realize well being and lifespan targets?

What are you ready to surrender? What aren’t you ready to surrender?

3. When trying to make enhancements, begin with the fundamentals first.

Overview the foundational well being behaviors on this article. What number of of them are you already doing? Persistently?

For those who’re protecting many of the fundamentals, you won’t must do extra. (Give your self a pat on the again. You’re already elite!)

Or, perhaps there’s some room for enchancment and also you’d wish to step it up a bit. Nice! For the overwhelming majority of individuals, bettering any of those behaviors will ship actual, tangible outcomes. Begin with these, earlier than chasing faddish, fringe, “super-optimal” stuff.

4. Tune out the noise.

These folks you hear on podcasts or social media aren’t the consultants on you and your life.

You get to determine what you need, and tips on how to go about getting it.

Be trustworthy with your self, and make decisions aligned with what issues most to you.

There’s loads of recommendation on the market, however bear in mind: It’s your life. You get to make choices that work for you.

References

Click on right here to view the data sources referenced on this article.

  1. Dalton, Amy N., and Stephen A. Spiller. 2012. “Too Much of a Good Thing: The Benefits of Implementation Intentions Depend on the Number of Goals.” The Journal of Client Analysis 39 (3): 600–614.
  2. Diener, Ed, and Micaela Y. Chan. 2011. “Happy People Live Longer: Subjective Well-Being Contributes to Health and Longevity.” Utilized Psychology. Well being and Effectively-Being 3 (1): 1–43.
  3. Suarez-Lledo, Victor, and Javier Alvarez-Galvez. 2021. “Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review.” Journal of Medical Web Analysis 23 (1): e17187.
  4. Crawford, Cindy, Bharathi Avula, Andrea T. Lindsey, Abraham Walter, Kumar Katragunta, Ikhlas A. Khan, and Patricia A. Deuster. 2022. “Analysis of Select Dietary Supplement Products Marketed to Support or Boost the Immune System.” JAMA Community Open 5 (8): e2226040.
  5. Crawford, Cindy, Courtney Boyd, Bharathi Avula, Yan-Hong Wang, Ikhlas A. Khan, and Patricia A. Deuster. 2020. “A Public Health Issue: Dietary Supplements Promoted for Brain Health and Cognitive Performance.” Journal of Various and Complementary Drugs (New York, N.Y.) 26 (4): 265–72.
  6. White, C. Michael. 2022. “Continued Risk of Dietary Supplements Adulterated with Approved and Unapproved Drugs: Assessment of the US Food and Drug Administration’s Tainted Supplements Database 2007 through 2021.” Journal of Scientific Pharmacology 62 (8): 928–34.
  7. Paffenbarger, R. S., Jr, R. T. Hyde, A. L. Wing, and C. C. Hsieh. 1986. “Physical Activity, All-Cause Mortality, and Longevity of College Alumni.” The New England Journal of Drugs 314 (10): 605–13.
  8. Watts, Eleanor L., Charles E. Matthews, Joshua R. Freeman, Jessica S. Gorzelitz, Hyokyoung G. Hong, Linda M. Liao, Kathleen M. McClain, Pedro F. Saint-Maurice, Eric J. Shiroma, and Steven C. Moore. 2022. “Association of Leisure Time Physical Activity Types and Risks of All-Cause, Cardiovascular, and Cancer Mortality among Older Adults.” JAMA Community Open 5 (8): e2228510.
  9. Jayedi, Ahmad, Ali Gohari, and Sakineh Shab-Bidar. 2022. “Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.” Sports activities Drugs (Auckland, N.Z.) 52 (1): 89–99.
  10. Del Pozo Cruz, Borja, Matthew Ahmadi, Sharon L. Naismith, and Emmanuel Stamatakis. 2022. “Association of Daily Step Count and Intensity with Incident Dementia in 78 430 Adults Living in the UK.” JAMA Neurology 79 (10): 1059–63.
  11. Abou Sawan, Sidney; Nunes, Everson A.; Lim, Changhyun; McKendry, James; Phillips, Stuart M.. “The Health Benefits of Resistance Exercise: Beyond Hypertrophy and Big Weights.” Train, Sport, and Motion 1(1):e00001, Winter 2023.
  12. “Falls.” n.d. Accessed Might 6, 2025. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/falls.
  13. Sadaqa, Munseef, Zsanett Németh, Alexandra Makai, Viktória Prémusz, and Márta Hock. 2023. “Effectiveness of Exercise Interventions on Fall Prevention in Ambulatory Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis.” Frontiers in Public Well being 11 (August): 1209319.
  14. Massini, Danilo A., Flávio H. Nedog, Thiago P. de Oliveira, Tiago A. F. Almeida, Caroline A. A. Santana, Cassiano M. Neiva, Anderson G. Macedo, et al. 2022. “The Effect of Resistance Training on Bone Mineral Density in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) 10 (6): 1129.
  15. Park, Jung Ha, Ji Hyun Moon, Hyeon Ju Kim, Mi Hee Kong, and Yun Hwan Oh. 2020. “Sedentary Lifestyle: Overview of Updated Evidence of Potential Health Risks.” Korean Journal of Household Drugs 41 (6): 365–73.
  16. Zisko, Nina, Kjerstin Næss Skjerve, Atefe R. Tari, Silvana Bucher Sandbakk, Ulrik Wisløff, Bjarne M. Nes, and Javaid Nauman. 2017. “Personal Activity Intelligence (PAI), Sedentary Behavior and Cardiovascular Risk Factor Clustering – the HUNT Study.” Progress in Cardiovascular Illnesses 60 (1): 89–95.
  17. “Train or Bodily Exercise.” 2024. September 25, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/exercise.htm.
  18. Carrard, Justin, Anne-Catherine Rigort, Christian Appenzeller-Herzog, Flora Colledge, Karsten Königstein, Timo Hinrichs, and Arno Schmidt-Trucksäss. 2022. “Diagnosing Overtraining Syndrome: A Scoping Review.” Sports activities Well being 14 (5): 665–73.
  19. Weakley, Jonathon, Shona L. Halson, and Iñigo Mujika. 2022. “Overtraining Syndrome Symptoms and Diagnosis in Athletes: Where Is the Research? A Systematic Review.” Worldwide Journal of Sports activities Physiology and Efficiency 17 (5): 675–81.
  20. Breuckmann, Frank, Stefan Möhlenkamp, Kai Nassenstein, Nils Lehmann, Susanne Ladd, Axel Schmermund, Burkhard Sievers, et al. 2009. “Myocardial Late Gadolinium Enhancement: Prevalence, Pattern, and Prognostic Relevance in Marathon Runners.” Radiology 251 (1): 50–57.
  21. Wilson, M., R. O’Hanlon, S. Prasad, A. Deighan, P. Macmillan, D. Oxborough, R. Godfrey, et al. 2011. “Diverse Patterns of Myocardial Fibrosis in Lifelong, Veteran Endurance Athletes.” Journal of Utilized Physiology (Bethesda, Md.: 1985) 110 (6): 1622–26.
  22. Möhlenkamp, Stefan, Nils Lehmann, Frank Breuckmann, Martina Bröcker-Preuss, Kai Nassenstein, Martin Halle, Thomas Budde, et al. 2008. “Running: The Risk of Coronary Events : Prevalence and Prognostic Relevance of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Marathon Runners.” European Coronary heart Journal 29 (15): 1903–10.
  23. Müssigbrodt, A., A. Weber, J. Mandrola, Y. van Belle, S. Richter, M. Döring, A. Arya, P. Sommer, A. Bollmann, and G. Hindricks. 2017. “Excess of Exercise Increases the Risk of Atrial Fibrillation.” Scandinavian Journal of Drugs & Science in Sports activities 27 (9): 910–17.
  24. Eijsvogels, Thijs M. H., Paul D. Thompson, and Barry A. Franklin. 2018. “The ‘Extreme Exercise Hypothesis’: Recent Findings and Cardiovascular Health Implications.” Present Remedy Choices in Cardiovascular Drugs 20 (10): 84.
  25. Franklin, Barry A., and Scott Billecke. 2012. “Putting the Benefits and Risks of Aerobic Exercise in Perspective.” Present Sports activities Drugs Reviews 11 (4): 201–8.
  26. Oteng, Antwi-Boasiako, and Sander Kersten. 2020. “Mechanisms of Action of Trans Fatty Acids.” Advances in Diet 11 (3): 697–708.
  27. Souza, Russell J. de, Andrew Mente, Adriana Maroleanu, Adrian I. Cozma, Vanessa Ha, Teruko Kishibe, Elizabeth Uleryk, et al. 2015. “Intake of Saturated and Trans Unsaturated Fatty Acids and Risk of All Cause Mortality, Cardiovascular Disease, and Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.” BMJ 351 (August): h3978.
  28. Dhaka, Vandana, Neelam Gulia, Kulveer Singh Ahlawat, and Bhupender Singh Khatkar. 2011. “Trans Fats-Sources, Health Risks and Alternative Approach – A Review.” Journal of Meals Science and Know-how 48 (5): 534–41.
  29. Ortega, Miguel A., Óscar Fraile-Martínez, Cielo García-Montero, Miguel Angel Alvarez-Mon, Guillermo Lahera, Jorge Monserrat, Maria Llavero-Valero, et al. 2022. “Biological Role of Nutrients, Food and Dietary Patterns in the Prevention and Clinical Management of Major Depressive Disorder.” Vitamins 14 (15): 3099.
  30. Piao, Jingjing, Yingwei Wang, Tianqi Zhang, Jiayu Zhao, Qianyu Lv, Mengyu Ruan, Qin Yu, and Bingjin Li. 2023. “Antidepressant-like Effects of Representative Types of Food and Their Possible Mechanisms.” Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) 28 (19): 6992.
  31. Saghafian, Faezeh, Hanieh Malmir, Parvane Saneei, Alireza Milajerdi, Bagher Larijani, and Ahmad Esmaillzadeh. 2018. “Fruit and Vegetable Consumption and Risk of Depression: Accumulative Evidence from an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Epidemiological Studies.” The British Journal of Diet 119 (10): 1087–1101.
  32. Juul, Filippa, Georgeta Vaidean, and Niyati Parekh. 2021. “Ultra-Processed Foods and Cardiovascular Diseases: Potential Mechanisms of Action.” Advances in Diet (Bethesda, Md.) 12 (5): 1673–80.
  33. Du, Shutong, Valerie Ok. Sullivan, Michael Fang, Lawrence J. Appel, Elizabeth Selvin, and Casey M. Rebholz. 2024. “Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Risk of Diabetes: Results from a Population-Based Prospective Cohort.” Diabetologia 67 (10): 2225–35.
  34. Kliemann, Nathalie, Fernanda Rauber, Renata Bertazzi Levy, Vivian Viallon, Eszter P. Vamos, Reynalda Cordova, Heinz Freisling, et al. 2023. “Food Processing and Cancer Risk in Europe: Results from the Prospective EPIC Cohort Study.” The Lancet. Planetary Well being 7 (3): e219–32.
  35. Fadnes, Lars T., Carlos Celis-Morales, Jan-Magnus Økland, Solange Parra-Soto, Katherine M. Livingstone, Frederick Ok. Ho, Jill P. Pell, et al. 2023. “Life Expectancy Can Increase by up to 10 Years Following Sustained Shifts towards Healthier Diets in the United Kingdom.” Nature Meals 4 (11): 961–65.
  36. Lane, Melissa M., Elizabeth Gamage, Shutong Du, Deborah N. Ashtree, Amelia J. McGuinness, Sarah Gauci, Phillip Baker, et al. 2024. “Ultra-Processed Food Exposure and Adverse Health Outcomes: Umbrella Review of Epidemiological Meta-Analyses.” BMJ (Scientific Analysis Ed.) 384 (February): e077310.
  37. Rico-Campà, Anaïs, Miguel A. Martínez-González, Ismael Alvarez-Alvarez, Raquel de Deus Mendonça, Carmen de la Fuente-Arrillaga, Clara Gómez-Donoso, and Maira Bes-Rastrollo. 2019. “Association between Consumption of Ultra-Processed Foods and All Cause Mortality: SUN Prospective Cohort Study.” BMJ (Scientific Analysis Ed.) 365 (Might): l1949.
  38. Wolfson, Julia A., Anna Claire Tucker, Cindy W. Leung, Casey M. Rebholz, Vanessa Garcia-Larsen, and Euridice Martinez-Steele. 2025. “Trends in Adults’ Intake of Un-Processed/Minimally Processed, and Ultra-Processed Foods at Home and Away from Home in the United States from 2003-2018.” The Journal of Diet 155 (1): 280–92.
  39. Wang, Dong D., Yanping Li, Shilpa N. Bhupathiraju, Bernard A. Rosner, Qi Solar, Edward L. Giovannucci, Eric B. Rimm, et al. 2021. “Fruit and Vegetable Intake and Mortality.” Circulation 143 (17): 1642–54.
  40. Boeing, Heiner, Angela Bechthold, Achim Bub, Sabine Ellinger, Dirk Haller, Anja Kroke, Eva Leschik-Bonnet, et al. 2012. “Critical Review: Vegetables and Fruit in the Prevention of Chronic Diseases.” European Journal of Diet 51 (6): 637–63.
  41. N.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://odphp.health.gov/sites/default/files/2019-09/2015-2020_Dietary_Guidelines.pdf.
  42. Lee-Kwan, Seung Hee, Latetia V. Moore, Heidi M. Blanck, Diane M. Harris, and Deb Galuska. 2017. “Disparities in State-Specific Adult Fruit and Vegetable Consumption – United States, 2015.” MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 66 (45): 1241–47.
  43. Naghshi, Sina, Omid Sadeghi, Walter C. Willett, and Ahmad Esmaillzadeh. 2020. “Dietary Intake of Total, Animal, and Plant Proteins and Risk of All Cause, Cardiovascular, and Cancer Mortality: Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.” BMJ (Scientific Analysis Ed.) 370 (July): m2412.
  44. Haghighatdoost, Fahimeh, Noushin Mohammadifard, Parisa Zakeri, Jamshid Najafian, Masoumeh Sadeghi, Hamidreza Roohafza, and Nizal Sarrafzadegan. 2023. “Differences in All-Cause Mortality Risk Associated with Animal and Plant Dietary Protein Sources Consumption.” Scientific Reviews 13 (1): 3396.
  45. Chen, Zhangling, Marija Glisic, Mingyang Music, Hamid A. Aliahmad, Xiaofang Zhang, Alice C. Moumdjian, Valentina Gonzalez-Jaramillo, et al. 2020. “Dietary Protein Intake and All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality: Results from the Rotterdam Study and a Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.” European Journal of Epidemiology 35 (5): 411–29.
  46. N.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://www.aicr.org/cancer-prevention/recommendations/limit-consumption-of-red-and-processed-meat/#what-the-science-says.
  47. “Most cancers: Carcinogenicity of the Consumption of Pink Meat and Processed Meat.” n.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/cancer-carcinogenicity-of-the-consumption-of-red-meat-and-processed-meat.
  48. Li, Chunxiao, Tom R. P. Bishop, Fumiaki Imamura, Stephen J. Sharp, Matthew Pearce, Soren Brage, Ken Ok. Ong, et al. 2024. “Meat Consumption and Incident Type 2 Diabetes: An Individual-Participant Federated Meta-Analysis of 1·97 Million Adults with 100 000 Incident Cases from 31 Cohorts in 20 Countries.” The Lancet. Diabetes & Endocrinology 12 (9): 619–30.
  49. Phillips, Stuart M., Stéphanie Chevalier, and Heather J. Leidy. 2016. “Protein ‘Requirements’ beyond the RDA: Implications for Optimizing Health.” Utilized Physiology Diet and Metabolism 41 (5): 565–72.
  50. Houston, Denise Ok., Barbara J. Nicklas, Jingzhong Ding, Tamara B. Harris, Frances A. Tylavsky, Anne B. Newman, Jung Solar Lee, et al. 2008. “Dietary Protein Intake Is Associated with Lean Mass Change in Older, Community-Dwelling Adults: The Health, Aging, and Body Composition (Health ABC) Study.” The American Journal of Scientific Diet 87 (1): 150–55.
  51. Hengeveld, Linda M., Jolanda M. A. Boer, Pierrette Gaudreau, Martijn W. Heymans, Carol Jagger, Nuno Mendonça, Marga C. Ocké, et al. 2020. “Prevalence of Protein Intake below Recommended in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis across Cohorts from the PROMISS Consortium.” Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle 11 (5): 1212–22.
  52. Bischoff-Ferrari, Heike A., Stephanie Gängler, Maud Wieczorek, Daniel W. Belsky, Joanne Ryan, Reto W. Kressig, Hannes B. Stähelin, et al. 2025. “Individual and Additive Effects of Vitamin D, Omega-3 and Exercise on DNA Methylation Clocks of Biological Aging in Older Adults from the DO-HEALTH Trial.” Nature Getting old 5 (3): 376–85.
  53. Navarro, Victor J., Ikhlas Khan, Einar Björnsson, Leonard B. Seeff, Jose Serrano, and Jay H. Hoofnagle. 2017. “Liver Injury from Herbal and Dietary Supplements.” Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) 65 (1): 363–73.
  54. Li, H., F. Qian, L. Han, W. Feng, D. Zheng, X. Guo, and H. Zhang. 2024. “Association of Healthy Sleep Patterns with Risk of Mortality and Life Expectancy at Age of 30 Years: A Population-Based Cohort Study.” QJM: Month-to-month Journal of the Affiliation of Physicians 117 (3): 177–86.
  55. Makarem, Nour, Cecilia Castro-Diehl, Marie-Pierre St-Onge, Susan Redline, Steven Shea, Donald Lloyd-Jones, Hongyan Ning, and Brooke Aggarwal. 2022. “Redefining Cardiovascular Health to Include Sleep: Prospective Associations with Cardiovascular Disease in the MESA Sleep Study.” Journal of the American Coronary heart Affiliation 11 (21): e025252.
  56. Chaput, Jean-Philippe, Caroline Dutil, Ryan Featherstone, Robert Ross, Lora Giangregorio, Travis J. Saunders, Ian Janssen, et al. 2020. “Sleep Duration and Health in Adults: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.” Utilized Physiology Diet and Metabolism 45 (10 (Suppl. 2)): S218–31.
  57. Winer, Joseph R., Kacie D. Deters, Gabriel Kennedy, Meghan Jin, Andrea Goldstein-Piekarski, Kathleen L. Poston, and Elizabeth C. Mormino. 2021. “Association of Short and Long Sleep Duration with Amyloid-β Burden and Cognition in Aging.” JAMA Neurology 78 (10): 1187–96.
  58. “Sleep Well being.” 2023. December 27, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/sleep-health.htm.
  59. Han, Han, Ying Wang, Tongtong Li, Chengwu Feng, Catherine Kaliszewski, Yang Su, Yinfan Wu, Jian Zhou, Liang Wang, and Geng Zong. 2023. “Sleep Duration and Risks of Incident Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality among People with Type 2 Diabetes.” Diabetes Care 46 (1): 101–10.
  60. Wang, Yafeng, Wentao Huang, Adrienne O’Neil, Yutao Lan, Dagfinn Aune, Wei Wang, Chuanhua Yu, and Xiong Chen. 2020. “Association between Sleep Duration and Mortality Risk among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Prospective Cohort Study.” Diabetologia 63 (11): 2292–2304.
  61. Jike, Maki, Osamu Itani, Norio Watanabe, Daniel J. Buysse, and Yoshitaka Kaneita. 2018. “Long Sleep Duration and Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression.” Sleep Drugs Critiques 39 (June): 25–36.
  62. Satyjeet, Fnu, Sidra Naz, Vinesh Kumar, Norah H. Aung, Kanwal Bansari, Sana Irfan, and Amber Rizwan. 2020. “Psychological Stress as a Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease: A Case-Control Study.” Cureus 12 (10): e10757.
  63. Vaccarino, Viola, and J. Douglas Bremner. 2024. “Stress and Cardiovascular Disease: An Update.” Nature Critiques. Cardiology 21 (9): 603–16.
  64. Ebstrup, Jeanette Frost, and Torben Jørgensen. 2012. “Stress and cardiovascular disease.” Ugeskrift for laeger 174 (4): 204–7.
  65. Schneiderman, Neil, Gail Ironson, and Scott D. Siegel. 2005. “Stress and Health: Psychological, Behavioral, and Biological Determinants.” Annual Overview of Scientific Psychology 1 (1): 607–28.
  66. N.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2021/03/one-year-pandemic-stress#:~:text=Nearly.
  67. Neff, Kristin D. 2023. “Self-Compassion: Theory, Method, Research, and Intervention.” Annual Overview of Psychology 74 (1): 193–218.
  68. Dweck CS. Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Random Home Publishing Group; 2006.
  69. Jamieson, Jeremy P., Alia J. Crum, J. Parker Goyer, Marisa E. Marotta, and Modupe Akinola. 2018. “Optimizing Stress Responses with Reappraisal and Mindset Interventions: An Integrated Model.” Anxiousness, Stress, and Coping 31 (3): 245–61.
  70. N.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2022/concerned-future-inflation.
  71. Authorities of Canada, and Statistics Canada. 2023. “Perceived Life Stress, by Age Group.” Authorities of Canada, Statistics Canada. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1310009604.
  72. N.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2023/collective-trauma-recovery.
  73. N.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/25663/social-isolation-and-loneliness-in-older-adults-opportunities-for-the.
  74. Reblin, Maija, and Bert N. Uchino. 2008. “Social and Emotional Support and Its Implication for Health.” Present Opinion in Psychiatry 21 (2): 201–5.
  75. Holt-Lunstad, Julianne, Timothy B. Smith, and J. Bradley Layton. 2010. “Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-Analytic Review.” PLoS Drugs 7 (7): e1000316.
  76. “Harvard Second Technology Research.” n.d. Harvardstudy. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://www.adultdevelopmentstudy.org/.
  77. CDC. 2025. “Well being Results of Social Isolation and Loneliness.” Social Connection. February 3, 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/social-connectedness/risk-factors/.
  78. “Loneliness Linked to Dementia Danger in Giant-Scale Evaluation.” n.d. Nationwide Institute on Getting old. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://www.nia.nih.gov/news/loneliness-linked-dementia-risk-large-scale-analysis.
  79. Holt-Lunstad, Julianne. 2024. “Social Connection as a Critical Factor for Mental and Physical Health: Evidence, Trends, Challenges, and Future Implications.” World Psychiatry: Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Affiliation (WPA) 23 (3): 312–32.
  80. N.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/surgeon-general-social-connection-advisory.pdf.
  81. Goddard, Isabel. 2023. “What Does Friendship Seem like in America?” Pew Analysis Middle. October 12, 2023. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/10/12/what-does-friendship-look-like-in-america/.
  82. Martino, Jessica, Jennifer Pegg, and Elizabeth Pegg Frates. 2017. “The Connection Prescription: Using the Power of Social Interactions and the Deep Desire for Connectedness to Empower Health and Wellness.” American Journal of Way of life Drugs 11 (6): 466–75.
  83. Kang, Weixi. 2023. “Understanding the Associations between the Number of Close Friends and Life Satisfaction: Considering Age Differences.” Frontiers in Psychology 14 (March): 1105771.
  84. Dunbar, Robin. 2011. “How Many ‘Friends’ Can You Really Have?” IEEE Spectrum 48 (6): 81–83.
  85. Steptoe, Andrew, Aparna Shankar, Panayotes Demakakos, and Jane Wardle. 2013. “Social Isolation, Loneliness, and All-Cause Mortality in Older Men and Women.” Proceedings of the Nationwide Academy of Sciences of america of America 110 (15): 5797–5801.
  86. Falci, Christina & McNeely, Clea. (2009). “Too Many Friends: Social Integration, Network Cohesion and Adolescent Depressive Symptoms.” Social Forces – SOC FORCES. 87. 10.1353/sof.0.0189.
  87. Stavrova, Olga, and Dongning Ren. 2021. “Is More Always Better? Examining the Nonlinear Association of Social Contact Frequency with Physical Health and Longevity.” Social Psychological and Character Science 12 (6): 1058–70.
  88. Leikas, Sointu, and Ville-Juhani Ilmarinen. 2017. “Happy Now, Tired Later? Extraverted and Conscientious Behavior Are Related to Immediate Mood Gains, but to Later Fatigue.” Journal of Character 85 (5): 603–15.
  89. “Cigarette Smoking and Digital Cigarette Use.” 2024. September 4, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/smoking.htm.
  90. N.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://ourworldindata.org/smoking.
  91. “Tobacco.” n.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tobacco.
  92. US Burden of Illness Collaborators, Ali H. Mokdad, Katherine Ballestros, Michelle Echko, Scott Glenn, Helen E. Olsen, Erin Mullany, et al. 2018. “The State of US Health, 1990-2016: Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors among US States.” JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Affiliation 319 (14): 1444–72.
  93. Nationwide Middle for Persistent Illness Prevention and Well being Promotion (US) Workplace on Smoking and Well being. 2014. The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention (US).
  94. Manuello, Jordi, Joosung Min, Paul McCarthy, Fidel Alfaro-Almagro, Soojin Lee, Stephen Smith, Lloyd T. Elliott, Anderson M. Winkler, and Gwenaëlle Douaud. 2024. “The Effects of Genetic and Modifiable Risk Factors on Brain Regions Vulnerable to Ageing and Disease.” Nature Communications 15 (1): 2576.
  95. Livingston, Gill, Jonathan Huntley, Andrew Sommerlad, David Ames, Clive Ballard, Sube Banerjee, Carol Brayne, et al. 2020. “Dementia Prevention, Intervention, and Care: 2020 Report of the Lancet Commission.” Lancet 396 (10248): 413–46.
  96. “Alcohol.” n.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/alcohol.
  97. GBD 2016 Alcohol Collaborators. 2018. “Alcohol Use and Burden for 195 Countries and Territories, 1990-2016: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.” Lancet 392 (10152): 1015–35.
  98. N.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov/alcohol/info.
  99. “Surveillance Report #120.” n.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/surveillance-reports/surveillance120.
  100. Livingston, Michael, and Sarah Callinan. 2015. “Underreporting in Alcohol Surveys: Whose Drinking Is Underestimated?” Journal of Research on Alcohol and Medication 76 (1): 158–64.
  101. Boniface, Sadie, James Kneale, and Nicola Shelton. 2014. “Drinking Pattern Is More Strongly Associated with Under-Reporting of Alcohol Consumption than Socio-Demographic Factors: Evidence from a Mixed-Methods Study.” BMC Public Well being 14 (1): 1297.
  102. N.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://ourworldindata.org/alcohol-consumption.
  103. Spencer, Merianne Rose, Sally C. Curtin, and Holly Hedegaard. 2020. “Rates of Alcohol-Induced Deaths among Adults Aged 25 and over in Urban and Rural Areas: United States, 2000-2018.” NCHS Knowledge Transient, no. 383 (October): 1–8.
  104. “No Degree of Alcohol Consumption Is Protected for Our Well being.” n.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://www.who.int/europe/news/item/04-01-2023-no-level-of-alcohol-consumption-is-safe-for-our-health.
  105. Biddinger KJ, Emdin CA, Haas ME, et al. “Association of Habitual Alcohol Intake With Risk of Cardiovascular Disease.” JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(3):e223849.
  106. Kahane, Work by Charles. n.d. “Lives Saved by Car Security Applied sciences 1960 to 2012.” Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/2015sae-kindelberger-livessaved.pdf.
  107. Inexperienced, A., G. Williams, R. Neale, V. Hart, D. Leslie, P. Parsons, G. C. Marks, et al. 1999. “Daily Sunscreen Application and Betacarotene Supplementation in Prevention of Basal-Cell and Squamous-Cell Carcinomas of the Skin: A Randomised Controlled Trial.” Lancet 354 (9180): 723–29.
  108. Inexperienced, Adèle C., Gail M. Williams, Valerie Logan, and Geoffrey M. Strutton. 2011. “Reduced Melanoma after Regular Sunscreen Use: Randomized Trial Follow-Up.” Journal of Scientific Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Scientific Oncology 29 (3): 257–63.
  109. Tan, Yunfei, Lili Fang, Yichen Zhu, and Kenji Hashimoto. 2024. “Relationship between Hearing Loss and Depression: A Cross-Sectional Analysis from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2015-2018.” Journal of Psychiatric Analysis 178 (October): 1–7.
  110. Bigelow, Robin T., Nicholas S. Reed, Katharine Ok. Brewster, Alison Huang, George Rebok, Bret R. Rutherford, and Frank R. Lin. 2020. “Association of Hearing Loss with Psychological Distress and Utilization of Mental Health Services among Adults in the United States.” JAMA Community Open 3 (7): e2010986.
  111. Wang, Hui-Fu, Wei Zhang, Edmund T. Rolls, Alzheimer’s Illness Neuroimaging Initiative, Yuzhu Li, Linbo Wang, Ya-Hui Ma, et al. 2022. “Hearing Impairment Is Associated with Cognitive Decline, Brain Atrophy and Tau Pathology.” EBioMedicine 86 (104336): 104336.
  112. Huang, Alison R., Kening Jiang, Frank R. Lin, Jennifer A. Deal, and Nicholas S. Reed. 2023. “Hearing Loss and Dementia Prevalence in Older Adults in the US.” JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Affiliation 329 (2): 171–73.
  113. Hung, Shih-Chang, Kuan-Fu Liao, Chih-Hsin Muo, Shih-Wei Lai, Chia-Wei Chang, and Hung-Chang Hung. 2015. “Hearing Loss Is Associated with Risk of Alzheimer’s Disease: A Case-Control Study in Older People.” Journal of Epidemiology 25 (8): 517–21.
  114. Campos, Laura, Allan Prochazka, Melinda Anderson, Alexander Kaizer, Carol Foster, and Timothy Hullar. 2023. “Consistent Hearing Aid Use Is Associated with Lower Fall Prevalence and Risk in Older Adults with Hearing Loss.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 71 (10): 3163–71.
  115. Riska, Kristal M., Sarah B. Peskoe, Maragatha Kuchibhatla, Alexander Gordee, Juliessa M. Pavon, Se Eun Kim, Jessica S. West, and Sherri L. Smith. 2022. “Impact of Hearing Aid Use on Falls and Falls-Related Injury: Results from the Health and Retirement Study.” Ear and Listening to 43 (2): 487–94.
  116. N.d. Accessed Might 2, 2025. https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/motor-vehicle/occupant-protection/seat-belts/.
  117. Fleming, Eleanor B., Duong Nguyen, Joseph Afful, Margaret D. Carroll, and Phillip D. Woods. 2018. “Prevalence of Daily Flossing among Adults by Selected Risk Factors for Periodontal Disease-United States, 2011-2014.” Journal of Periodontology 89 (8): 933–39.
  118. Olsson, Bjørn. 2023. “Increased Bicycle Helmet Use in the Absence of Mandatory Bicycle Helmet Legislation: Prevalence and Trends from Longitudinal Observational Studies on the Use of Bicycle Helmets among Cyclists in Denmark 2004-2022.” Journal of Security Analysis 87 (December): 54–63.
  119. Bonyun, Marissa, Andi Camden, Colin Macarthur, and Andrew Howard. 2012. “Helmet Use in BIXI Cyclists in Toronto, Canada: An Observational Study.” BMJ Open 2 (3): e001049.
  120. Shool, Sina, Seyed Mohammad Piri, Zahra Ghodsi, Reza Tabrizi, Mohammad Hosein Amirzade-Iranaq, Mahdieh Mashayekhi, Mohammad Amin Dabbagh Ohadi, et al. 2024. “The Prevalence of Helmet Use in Motorcyclists around the World: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 5,006,476 Participants.” Worldwide Journal of Harm Management and Security Promotion 31 (3): 431–69.
  121. Waltzman, Dana, Kelly Sarmiento, Xinjian Zhang, and Gabrielle F. Miller. 2023. “Estimated Prevalence of Helmet Use While Bicycling, Rollerblading, and Skateboarding among Middle School Students in Selected U.S. States- Youth Behavior Risk Survey, 2013-2019.” Journal of Security Analysis 87 (December): 367–74.
  122. Livingston, Gill, Jonathan Huntley, Andrew Sommerlad, David Ames, Clive Ballard, Sube Banerjee, Carol Brayne, et al. 2020. “Dementia Prevention, Intervention, and Care: 2020 Report of the Lancet Commission.” Lancet 396 (10248): 413–46.
  123. Kim, Eric S., Ying Chen, Julia S. Nakamura, Carol D. Ryff, and Tyler J. VanderWeele. 2022. “Sense of Purpose in Life and Subsequent Physical, Behavioral, and Psychosocial Health: An Outcome-Wide Approach.” American Journal of Well being Promotion: AJHP 36 (1): 137–47.

For those who’re a coach, otherwise you need to be…


You’ll be able to assist folks construct sustainable diet and way of life habits that may considerably enhance their bodily and psychological well being—when you make an awesome dwelling doing what you like. We’ll present you the way.


For those who’d wish to study extra, think about the PN Level 1 Nutrition Coaching Certification. (You’ll be able to enroll now at a giant low cost.)



Source link

Tags: extremeHealthLongevityoptimizationtakes
Share30Tweet19
ohog5

ohog5

Recommended For You

AI Now Decodes Your Sweat to Spot Early Signs of Disease

by ohog5
December 5, 2025
0
AI Now Decodes Your Sweat to Spot Early Signs of Disease

Researchers are uncovering how sweat might turn into a strong instrument for real-time well being monitoring. Sweat carries a surprisingly wealthy assortment of organic alerts, and a brand...

Read more

Scientists Close In on a Universal Cancer Vaccine

by ohog5
December 3, 2025
0
Scientists Close In on a Universal Cancer Vaccine

A brand new nanoparticle vaccine efficiently prevented a number of aggressive cancers in mice, together with pancreatic and melanoma. The remedy activated sturdy immune reminiscence, maintaining as much...

Read more

Everyday Plastics Could Be Fueling Obesity, Infertility, and Asthma

by ohog5
December 2, 2025
0
Everyday Plastics Could Be Fueling Obesity, Infertility, and Asthma

New analysis reveals that chemical substances in frequent plastics might quietly set off lifelong well being issues. Publicity early in life has been linked to weight problems, infertility,...

Read more

Scientists Discover How To “Hack” Bacterial Conversations To Prevent Gum Disease

by ohog5
November 30, 2025
0
Scientists Discover How To “Hack” Bacterial Conversations To Prevent Gum Disease

Disrupting the chemical messages that oral micro organism use to coordinate development could assist forestall illness by retaining plaque communities in a more healthy state. Like all dwelling...

Read more

Scientists Uncover Hidden Blood Pattern in Long COVID

by ohog5
November 29, 2025
0
Scientists Uncover Hidden Blood Pattern in Long COVID

Researchers discovered persistent microclot and NET constructions in Lengthy COVID blood which will clarify long-lasting signs. Researchers analyzing Lengthy COVID have recognized a structural connection between circulating microclots...

Read more
Next Post
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Issues Must Read Dissent After Conservative Justices Give DOGE Access To Social Security Data

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Issues Must Read Dissent After Conservative Justices Give DOGE Access To Social Security Data

Related News

Michigan court decides Trump will remain candidate in GOP amid Capitol attack challenge | World News

Hong Kong Is Over Unless China Fixes Its Own Economy, Roach Says | World News

February 21, 2024
Latest News, Live Updates Today July 7, 2024: Jammu and Kashmir: 2 soldiers, 4 terrorists killed in Kulgam encounters | Latest updates

Latest News, Live Updates Today July 7, 2024: Jammu and Kashmir: 2 soldiers, 4 terrorists killed in Kulgam encounters | Latest updates

July 7, 2024
Has Moore v. Harper Become Moot?

A Tale Of Two Shadow Dockets

April 23, 2025

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Health
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • World

Recent News

Trump to roll out sweeping new tariffs – CNN

Sudden business closures leave gift card holders in the lurch – Times Union

December 5, 2025
“This Chat’s Kind of Dead. Anything Going On?”

“This Chat’s Kind of Dead. Anything Going On?”

December 5, 2025

CATEGORIES

  • Business
  • Health
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • World

Follow Us

Recommended

  • Sudden business closures leave gift card holders in the lurch – Times Union
  • “This Chat’s Kind of Dead. Anything Going On?”
  • World Cup 2026 draw live updates: Latest news and everything you need to know about today’s ceremony – The Athletic – The New York Times
  • DHS Announces Arrests as Immigration Operation Underway in Minneapolis
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • World
  • Podcast
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Awards
  • Shop

© 2023 ThisBigInfluence

Cleantalk Pixel
Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?