Wednesday, February 4, 2026
This Big Influence
  • Home
  • World
  • Podcast
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Awards
  • Shop
No Result
View All Result
This Big Influence
No Result
View All Result
Home Tech

Scientists Just Figured Out Exactly How People Judge Your Body Count

ohog5 by ohog5
August 10, 2025
in Tech
0
Scientists Just Figured Out Exactly How People Judge Your Body Count
74
SHARES
1.2k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


Picture by Getty / Futurism

It is no shock that potential companions choose us for a way many individuals we have had intercourse with — however new analysis means that there are key components which will influence simply how judgmental they might be.

You might also like

Democracy Itself Is Falling Apart, Harvard Professor Warns

Staying single long-term may be bad for your well-being

ICE and Qatari Security Forces at the Winter Olympics Put Italians on Edge

Revealed within the journal Sciences Advances, a new paper out of Wales’ Swansea College discovered that though many of us are nonetheless reticent to decide to those that have excessive “physique counts” — well-liked slang for an individual’s variety of earlier sexual companions — many are prepared to look previous it if these numbers dwindled over time, suggesting they grew out of an curiosity in informal intercourse.

In a wide-reaching survey of greater than 5,300 folks throughout 11 international locations and 5 continents, the Welsh psychological researchers examined a various swathe of the worldwide inhabitants’s outlook on potential companions primarily based on their sexual historical past.

Some findings have been unsurprising. General, folks appeared to choose that their potential paramours had fewer companions.

Others contradicted well-liked narratives, resembling the shortage of a double customary between how folks judged the variety of companions women and men had throughout the 11 international locations surveyed.

And different outcomes appeared to uncover mechanisms of judgment that is likely to be intuitive, however have not saturated well-liked tradition in the identical means. One experiment, as an example, concerned displaying examine individuals visible timelines meant to symbolize a theoretical accomplice’s sexual historical past.

The discovering from that experiment was intriguing: even when totally different timelines included the identical variety of previous companions, they have been designed in order that the focus over time various considerably, with some displaying much more encounters early in life, others lowering steadily over time, and others unfold out evenly all through.

After inspecting the timelines, the examine’s topics have been requested how prepared they might be to decide to or date severely somebody with every corresponding sexual historical past. These whose variety of new companions dwindled later of their lives have been the clear winners.

Whereas it could appear overly judgmental to base one’s willingness to commit on notches in a possible accomplice’s bedpost, head Swansea researcher Andrew Thomas posited that these preferences are rooted in a deep-seated want for stability.

“Folks use sexual historical past as a cue to evaluate relationship threat,” Thomas mentioned in a statement concerning the analysis. “In our ancestral previous, realizing somebody’s sexual historical past may assist folks keep away from dangers like [sexually transmitted infections], infidelity, emotional instability, or rivalry with ex-partners.”

Although there have been loads of previous study displaying that people prefer partners with decrease body counts, this new analysis not solely provides important caveats to that desire, but additionally included respondents across the globe, from Japan and Brazil to Australia and Slovakia. (Notably, it doesn’t seem that any folks from the continent of Africa have been surveyed.)

In sum, the examine presents a novel and nuanced look into how folks truly really feel about their companions’ physique counts — and one that implies that many individuals are much less judgmental about sexual historical past than we have been led to consider.

Extra on intercourse psychology: Scientists Identify Ideal Amount of Boinking for Maximum Mental Health



Source link

Tags: BodycountFiguredJudgePeopleScientists
Share30Tweet19
ohog5

ohog5

Recommended For You

Democracy Itself Is Falling Apart, Harvard Professor Warns

by ohog5
February 3, 2026
0
Democracy Itself Is Falling Apart, Harvard Professor Warns

Illustration by Tag Hartman-Simkins / Futurism. Supply: Getty Photographs Within the wake of ruthless arrests of journalists Don Lemon and Georgia Fort in Minneapolis, one Harvard political scientist...

Read more

Staying single long-term may be bad for your well-being

by ohog5
February 3, 2026
0
Staying single long-term may be bad for your well-being

Share this Article You might be free to share this text beneath the Attribution 4.0 Worldwide license. A brand new research exhibits that long-term singles expertise a sharper...

Read more

ICE and Qatari Security Forces at the Winter Olympics Put Italians on Edge

by ohog5
February 2, 2026
0
ICE and Qatari Security Forces at the Winter Olympics Put Italians on Edge

With lower than every week to go till the beginning of the 2026 Milano Cortina Winter Olympics in Italy, the subject making headlines isn’t sports activities. It’s safety....

Read more

Govee Permanent Outdoor Lights Prism Review: Get the coolest lights on the market

by ohog5
February 2, 2026
0
Govee Permanent Outdoor Lights Prism Review: Get the coolest lights on the market

Desk of Contents Desk of Contents Desk of Contents A unending occasion A elaborate improve from the unique Govee Everlasting Outside Lights A playful app What I don’t...

Read more

AI Is Now More Creative Than the Average Human

by ohog5
February 1, 2026
0
AI Is Now More Creative Than the Average Human

Are generative synthetic intelligence programs corresponding to ChatGPT able to actual creativity? A brand new large-scale research led by Professor Karim Jerbi from the Division of Psychology on...

Read more
Next Post
Trump to roll out sweeping new tariffs – CNN

Keppel to gain $778 million from sale of 83.9% stake in M1's telecom business - Reuters

Related News

Harvard Scientists Control “Points of Darkness” for Remote Sensing and Covert Detection Applications

Harvard Scientists Control “Points of Darkness” for Remote Sensing and Covert Detection Applications

July 5, 2023
World News in Brief: Rights chief ‘horrified’ at deadly PNG violence, Lebanon-Israel ‘knife edge’, Sudan refugees suffer sexual violence | Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs – Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs

Paris Olympics: World's fastest man Noah Lyles happy to carry weight of medals – and a bigger mission – Sky News

August 12, 2024
World News in Brief: Rights chief ‘horrified’ at deadly PNG violence, Lebanon-Israel ‘knife edge’, Sudan refugees suffer sexual violence | Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs – Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs

LinkedIn co-founder: "The Democratic ticket is more pro-business" – MSNBC

July 26, 2024

Browse by Category

  • Business
  • Health
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • World

Recent News

How Chronic Kidney Disease Quietly Poisons the Heart

How Chronic Kidney Disease Quietly Poisons the Heart

February 3, 2026
Democracy Itself Is Falling Apart, Harvard Professor Warns

Democracy Itself Is Falling Apart, Harvard Professor Warns

February 3, 2026

CATEGORIES

  • Business
  • Health
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • World

Follow Us

Recommended

  • How Chronic Kidney Disease Quietly Poisons the Heart
  • Democracy Itself Is Falling Apart, Harvard Professor Warns
  • Staying single long-term may be bad for your well-being
  • ICE and Qatari Security Forces at the Winter Olympics Put Italians on Edge
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • World
  • Podcast
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Awards
  • Shop

© 2023 ThisBigInfluence

Cleantalk Pixel
Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?