In contrast to Ilya, I’ve been delinquent in posting info on upcoming talking engagements. I forgot to let readers learn about my talk to the University of Michigan Law School Federalist Society chapter on local weather change coverage (with a response by Prof. Rachel Rothschild), my presentation of my paper, “Standing without Injury” on the College of Chicago Constitutional Legislation Institute’s Standing Doctrine Conference, and my participation in a panel on “Can Firms Be Sued for International Warming?” on the annual Cox Heart for Internatinal Legislation Convention on “Climate Change and International Law at a Crossroad.”
Maybe most significantly, I uncared for to notice my participation on this 12 months’s “IronConLawProf” occasion sponsored by CWRU’s Federalist Society chapter. It is a notably enjoyable occasion, wherein professors are recruited to stage a mock oral argument for a case pending earlier than the Supreme Courtroom. What makes the occasion notably enjoyable (and impressed the title) is that the collaborating professors have no idea which aspect they must argue till the beginning of the occasion. This 12 months’s case was Loper Vibrant Enterprises v. Raimando (the Chevron case), and I drew the federal government, so I needed to do my finest Elizabeth Prelogar impersonation. My colleague Prof. Jessie Hill was caught arguing that Chevron must be overturned.
Here’s a temporary itemizing of public talking engagements I’ve scheduled for the stability of the semester. (I will replace this listing if extra occasions come up.)
On October 5, I will be talking at a Federal Bar Association, Northern District of Ohio Chapter CLE program on the, “Administrative Procedures Act Seminar: History, Interpretations, and Latest Rulings from the Bench.” Different audio system embody Profs. Emily Bremer of Notre Dame and Christopher Walker of Michigan. The occasion is 9am-1pm on the Carl B. Stokes Courthouse in Cleveland. Registration information is here.
On October 10, I will probably be chatting with the Federalist Society scholar chapter at Harvard Legislation Faculty on “Environental Federalism: States as Laboratories of Environmental Coverage.” Prof. James Salzman will present vital commentary. Particulars here.
On October 17, I will probably be talking at mid-day to the Federalist Society scholar chapter on the College of Chicago on “Why the EPA Will Not Save Us from Local weather Change.”
On October 24, I will probably be making two Federalist Society chapter talks in Washington, D.C. First, at noontime, I will probably be chatting with the coed chapter at George Washington College Legislation Faculty once more on “Why the EPA Will Not Save Us from Local weather Change.”
At 5pm that day, I’ll converse to the coed chapter on the Georgetown College Legislation Heart on the Roberts Courtroom and my claim that the Courtroom is (by historic measures) comparatively restrained. Prof. Josh Chafetz will probably be readily available to heartily disagree.
On October 27, I will probably be a panelist on “State Constitutions and Climate Change” sponsored by the State Democracy Analysis Initiative on the College of Wisconsin Legislation Faculty. Different audio system embody Retired Justice Michael Wilson of the Hawaii Supreme Courtroom, Dean Elizabeth Kronk Warner (S.J. Quinney Faculty of Legislation), Professor Shelley Welton (Penn Carrey Legislation Faculty), and Professor Miriam Seifter (Wisconsin).
