We at the moment are 100 days into the Trump Administration. As greatest as I can inform, there was zero litigation over whether or not Part 3 of the Fourteenth Modification disqualifies Trump from the presidency. In the course of the Joint Session of Congress on January 6, 2025, there have been zero objections raised primarily based on Part 3. But, it’s arduous to imagine that about fifteen months in the past, the Supreme Court docket was being requested to disqualify Trump from the poll.
As common readers of this weblog will recall, Seth Barrett Tillman and I have been actively engaged within the course of to disqualify Trump between 2021 and 2024. I focus on lots of the issues we did throughout this time in a brand new article for the Mississippi Regulation Journal’s symposium challenge on the Fourteenth Modification.
Right here is the summary of Forcibly Sweeping Section 3 Up To The Supreme Court:
Within the wake of January 6, 2021 a two-year lawfare marketing campaign was waged to stop Donald Trump from being re-elected president. That motion reached its pinnacle on December 19, 2023, when the Colorado Supreme Court docket dominated that Part 3 of the Fourteenth Modification disqualified Donald Trump from the presidency. However lower than three months later, on March 3, 2024, america Supreme Court docket unanimously reversed the state court docket. President Trump was re-elected, and authorized on January 6, 2025.
This Article is just not supposed to clarify the nuances of Part 3, summarize the entire litigation, and even analyze how the Supreme Court docket determined the case. Moderately, this Article is considerably private in nature. It tells my very own expertise within the Part 3 litigation, from January 6, 2021, by January 6, 2025. This Article, I hope, will encapsulate the position that I performed on this course of with my buddy and colleague Seth Barrett Tillman.
Seth additionally contributed to this symposium challenge. His article is titled, Some Personal Reflections on the Recent Litigation Involving Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment. Here’s a snippet from the introduction:
What follows is just not particularly an try and reargue the deserves of disputes between my interlocutors and myself [which were debated during the recent Section 3 ballot-access Trump-related cases], however an try to clarify my private expertise in trying to debate a set of mental factors—factors which I had developed since circa 2007 and refined in cooperation with Professor Blackman since 2017. Though I make no declare to objectivity amongst competing views, I hope to point out that conventional educational {and professional} norms stay worthy aspirational objectives, even the place unmet.
Trying again, this paper is just not a lot about Part 3 of Modification XIV and up to date ballot-access Trump-related litigation. Moderately, it’s extra concerning the decline in civility and aspirational requirements inside the polity, the courts, and authorized academia.
And one other snippet from the conclusion:
It’s mentioned that on the negotiations at Appomattox Courthouse—Lee and Grant have been each frank and civil throughout the course of discussing the give up of Lee’s Military of Northern Virginia. Afterwards, Grant despatched meals to Lee to feed his (and, then, their) nation’s former enemy troopers. Celebrations for Grant’s troopers got here solely later—not whereas Lee’s troopers remained current. Once more, in ending lively hostilities, step one in the direction of nationwide reconciliation was frank and civil discourse.
I don’t suppose our current and future is or might be as troublesome as was Grant and Lee’s. However we too have to consider nationwide reconciliation. It appears to me that the primary steps in that route contain frank and civil dialogue, absent hyperbole, and absent identify calling. If federal judges, state judges, and authorized teachers are lower than that job, then that’s simply one other institutional and cultural downside crying out for reform and renewal.
Likewise, our home legislation colleges are supported by taxes, tuition, and donations. If universities and teachers solely additional burden American society by casting apart our free speech traditions and actively have interaction in simply one other entrance in our tradition wars, then wider society would possibly very effectively select to withhold assist. Maybe this course of has already begun?
Typically Seth and I publish collectively, however for this symposium, it was helpful to publish individually. The Part 3 litigation is just not one thing we’ll quickly neglect, even when others would fairly not recall what they tried to do.
